Over the years, poker has become extremely popular in casinos around the world. With the advent of computers and the Internet, many people began to play various online poker in the best casinos. The Worlds Series of Poker’s uneasy relationship with online gambling appeared in 2003; when an accountant qualified through an online tournament won a major event, making online poker more popular than ever. At that time, advertising for QQ Poker sites on the Internet on television exploded, and the Department of Justice intervened. In June 2003, the Ministry of Justice warned the National Broadcasting Association that any natural or legal person who promotes or encourages online gambling is punished as an offending director.
Worlds Series of Poker
About half of the 9,000 players in the Worlds Series of Poker Main Event went through an online satellite tournament. However, the tournament commissioner said that the World Series player was not participating in the online tournaments, but $ 10,000 was spent for a seat at the table.
The televised Worlds Series of Poker tournament was postponed for several minutes on the first day because no one with the dotcom logo was allowed to play. There were about a thousand players who turned their shirts over, and workers who covered the dotcom symbols with a black ribbon.
A bill in the US Congress would prohibit online gambling, other than gambling in races and state lotteries. This is an attempt to bridge the gap in the 1961 Wire Act, aimed at suppressing organized crime. The Wire Act prohibits companies from using cable communications to bet on any sporting event or competition. However, according to the New Orleans Federal Court of Appeals, the law does not apply to other types of casino gambling, leaving some doubts as to whether prosecutors can close online poker and other casino games. With or without a new law in Congress, the Department of Justice interprets all online gambling as illegal. In other countries, this is allowed, so online companies open operations outside the United States with easy access to American players on their computers.
Proponents of online poker say the practice of compliance with the Department of Justice has focused on online sports betting operators.
Conclusion
It would be difficult to arrest the operators of poker sites, and other offshore operations, but many argue that online poker tournaments are technically not gambling. The argument is that you get a prize for the competition. Besides, prosecuting a business for promoting dot-net, which does not have direct web links to its cousin, makes it challenging to work in court.